نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی
نویسندگان
1 گروه آموزش ابتدایی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، ایران
2 گروه مدیریت، واحد پارس آباد مغان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، پارس آباد مغان، ایران.
3 کارمند آموزش و پرورش شهرستان اسلامشهر.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
This study focused on identify and analyze the factors which affect tolerance, ethics, complaisance, and respect for others' ideas for the school year 2018-2019 in the case of Islamshahr primary schools' environment. The statistical population of this study consisted of elementary teachers in Islamshahr. In the qualitative phase, 11 individuals were selected through a purposeful sampling and 298 random individuals were selected for the quantitative phase. A questionnaire-based collected data represented a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82 within the qualitative phase. To analyze the findings of the qualitative interviews, the inductive content analysis method based on open coding was used. To analyze quantitative data, the structural equation model with PLS software was implemented. An unstructured interview using the three-dimensional approach and participant feedback to validating was accomplished for the qualitative phase. The research findings revealed that organizational factors included (ethical discussion in the class, schools' culture, schools' atmosphere, respectful behavior in the class, and social skills training programs) and family factors (education level of parents, family culture, student characteristics) influence tolerance, ethics, and respect for others' ideas in the school environment. Moreover, based on standardized factor loadings with the statistical significant of 0.05, this research declared that creating ethical discussion in class 0.752-factor loading is the most influential of tolerance for the other thoughts and the least effective factor 0.918-factor loading is students' characteristics.
Keywords: Education, Respect, Ethics and complaisance, Islamshahr
کلیدواژهها [English]
28.Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217-227.
29.Bal, E., & Bicen, H. (2017). The purpose of students’ social media use and determining their perspectives on education. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 177-181.
30.Ceyda, G., & Sevinc, P. (2012). Determination of high schools organizational climate. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2947-2950.
31.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research . Boston: Edwards Brothers.
32.Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 276-283.
33.Elovainio, M., van den Bos, K., Linna, A., Kivimäki, M., Ala-Mursula, L., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2005). Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Social science & medicine, 61(12), 2501-2512.
34.Gruioniu, O. (2013). The philosophy for children, an ideal tool to stimulate the thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 378-382.
35.Kase, T., Ueno, Y., Shimamoto, K., & Oishi, K. (2019). Causal relationships between sense of coherence and life skills: Examining the short-term longitudinal data of Japanese youths. Mental Health & Prevention, 13, 14-20.
36.Mei-Ju, C., Chen-Hsin, Y., & Pin-Chen, H. (2014). The beauty of character education on preschool children's parent-child relationship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 527-533.
37.Mertz, C., Eckloff, T., Johannsen, J., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2015). Respected Students Equal Better Students: Investigating the Links between Respect and Performance in Schools. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 74.
38.Nga, V. T., Dung, V. N. T., Chu, D. T., Tien, N. L. B., Van Thanh, V., Ngoc, V. T. N., ... & Show, P. L. (2019). School education and childhood obesity: A systemic review. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews,13(4), 2495-2501.
39.Van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 38 (2), 185-200.
40.Viner, R. M., Hargreaves, D. S., Ward, J., Bonell, C., Mokdad, A. H., & Patton, G. (2017). The health benefits of secondary education in adolescents and young adults: an international analysis in 186 low-, middle-and high-income countries from 1990 to 2013. SSM-population health, 3, 162-171.