An analysis of the factors influencing the gap between theory and practice in elementary teachers

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 Lecturer, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Bahonar Campus, Farhangian University, Kerman, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the gap between theory and practice in elementary teachers. For this purpose, the method of narrative research has been used and based on the criterion-based purposeful sampling method, 16 sample teachers of public elementary schools in Tehran were interviewed until the theoretical saturation of the data. Narrative and semi-structured interviews as well as field notes were used to collect data. In order to analyze the data, the method of thematic analysis of narratives was used. Findings showed that there are 4 main themes (teacher) experiences (teacher experiences, education, teacher personality traits and the nature of the elementary child) as aspects affecting teachers' practice. The results of this study show that teachers' practice is not only affected by education; There are also three factors: teacher experience, teacher personality traits, and the nature of the elementary child, which justify the gap between educational theorist theory and elementary teacher practice. Ignoring these three factors will reduce the efficiency of pre-, early and in-service training courses for teachers.

Keywords


اسکایرو، مایکل استفن. (1393). نظریه برنامه درسی. (ترجمه افسانه کلباسی، پوران خروشی، زینب­السادات اطهری و وحید عشوریون). اصفهان: شوناز.
ایروانی، شهین. (1388). رابطه نظریه و عمل در تعلیم و تربیت. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
جرالد ال. گوتک. (1385). مکاتب فلسفی و آراء تربیتی. (ترجمه محمد جعفر پاک سرشت). تهران: سمت.
خسروی، رحمت الله. (1393). تبیین و نقد آزادسازی برنامه درسی و ارائه الگویی برای نظام برنامه ریزی درسی ایران با تاکید بر نظریه عملگرای شواب و چگونگی کاربست آن در یک استان کشور (مورد استان زنجان). رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، چاپ نشده.
خنیفر، حسین؛ مسلمی، ناهید. (1396). اصول و مبانی روش­های پژوهش کیفی؛ رویکردی نو و کاربردی. تهران: نگاه دانش.
صافی، احمد. (1398). صد سال تربیت معلم در ایران: فرصتها، تهدیدها و چشم انداز آینده. تعلیم و تربیت، 35(138)، 83-106.
عطاران، محمد. (1395). پژوهش روایی؛ اصول و مراحل. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه فرهنگیان.
کار، ویلفرد. (1376). نظریه تربیتی و ارتباط آن با عمل تربیتی. (ترجمه سید مهدی سجادی). مدرس علوم انسانی،2(3)، 16-29.
کرسول جان دبلیو؛ کلارک، ویکی پلانو.( 1390). روشهای پژوهش ترکیبی. (ترجمه جاوید سرایی، علیرضا کیامنش). تهران: انتشارات آییژ.
میلر، جی. پی. (1383). نظریه های برنامه درسی. (ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی). تهران: سمت.
References
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Reseach in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brennan, A. & King, F. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of transformative professional learning to narrow the values practice gap related to inclusive practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(2), 175–193.
Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710
Carr, W. (2006). Education Without Theory. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54 )2(, 136-159.
Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. In N.k. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds). Hnadbook of qualitative research, pp. 651-680. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (2000). Teachers as Curriculum Planners. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C. & Terwilliger, L. (2015). Teacher Personal Practical Theories and Their Influence Upon Teacher Curricular and Instructional Actions: A Case Study of a Secondary Science Teacher. Science Education, 74(5), 517-529.
Deng, Z. (2004). The Role of Theory in Teacher Preparation: an Analysis of the Concept of Theory Application. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 143-160.
Fernandez-Batanero, J., Roman-Gravan, P., Reyez-Rebollo, M. & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of Educational Technology on Teacher Stress and Anxiety: A Literature Review, 18(3), 1-13.
Fickel, L. H. (2020). Democracy is Messy: Exploring the Personal Theories of a High School Social Studies Teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education, 28(3), 359-389.
Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the Changing Nature of Educational Development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4-14.
Kacaniku, F. (2022). I Want to Become a Teacher because…? Student-Teachers Change in Attitudes of Becoming Teachers in Austria and Kosovo. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9355679.
 Karwowski Ewa. (2019). How Financialization Undermines Democracy, 50(5), 1466-1481.
Levin, B. B., He, Y. & Allen, M. H. (2013). Teacher Beliefs In Action: A Cross-sectional Longitudinal Follow-Up Study of Teachers’ Personal Practical Theories. The Teacher Educator, 48(3), 201-217.
Moon, J. & Lee, D. (2022). Bridging reflection theory and practices in physical education: a scoping review of teacher education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(3), 635 – 644.
Nilholm, Claes. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020-how can we improve our theories in order to change practice?, 36(3), 358-370.
Priest, H., Roberts, P. & Woods, L. (2015). An Overview of Three Different Approaches to the Interpretation of Qualitative Data. Part 1: Theoretical Issues. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), 30-42.
Resch, K. & Schrittesser, I. (2023). Using the service-learning approach to bridge the gap between theory and practice in teacher education. International journal of inclusive education, 12(3), 1-15.
Ribaeus, K., Enochsson, A. & Hultman, A. L. (2022). Student teachers’ professional development: early practice and horizontal networks as ways to bridge the theory-practice gap. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 43(1), 2-16.
Rycroft-Smith, L. (2022). Knowledge brokering to bridge the research practice gap in education: Where are we now?. Review of Education, 1(12), 1-46.
Saifan, A., AbuRuz, M. E. & Masa’deh, R. (2015). Theory Practice Gaps in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 20.29.
Zi Yan, Ziqi Li, Ernesto Panadero & Hongling Lao. (2021). A Systematic Review on Factors influencing Teachers’ Intentions and Implementations Regarding Formative Assessment, 28(3), 228-260.