The Effect of Reverse education on goal orientation learning in English Language

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 Ph.d. student in educational psychology, Department of psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Azarbaijan University of Shahid Madani, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Curriculum Planning, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Reverse education on goal orientation and all components of them in female high school students in English language course. Method : The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test with a control group. The statistical population of this study consisted of all 10th grade female students in Kleyber city in the academic year of 1395-96; among them, sample’s of 34 were selected by convenience sampling method and were randomly divided in to two groups, 18 people were in the experimental group and 16 people were in the control group. Data were gathered using Midgley et al.(1998) goal orientation questionnaire. Initially, both questionnaires were run as pretest on both groups(experimental and control). Then the experimental group was subjected to reverse education English language course for 10 sessions. After completion of educational sessions both post-test groups were performed. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of covariance). Results: The results of covariance­ analysis showed that reverse education was effective on goal orientation(p < 0.05). Also, based on the results, the effect of reverse education on all components of mastery(F=27/996, p < 0.001) and performance goals(F=36/550, p < 0.001) had a significant effect; but had no significant effect on avoidance goals(F=1/048, P=0/314). These results suggest that reverse education improves goal orientation in learning. Conclusion: Therefore, follow-up study is necessary to investigate further the application of reverse education in various students and teaching methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development,34(1),1-14.
  2. Barkoukis, V., Ntoumanis, N., & Thogerasen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). Developmental changes in achivment motivation and affect in physical education: groth tranjectories and demographic differences. Psychology of sport and exercise, 11(2), 83-90.
  3. Cabi, E.,(2018). The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3),203-221.
  4. Chen CH.M., & Hsu SH.H.( 2008). Personalized Mobile Learning System for Supportive Effective English Learning, . Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 153-180
  5. Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2016). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1(1), 1-25.
  6. Chien-Yuan Su &  Cheng-Huan Chen.(2018).Investigating the Effects of Flipped Learning, Student Question Generation, and Instant Response Technologies on Students’ Learning Motivation, Attitudes, and Engagement: A Structural Equation Modeling.         Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science And Technology Education, 14(6), 2453-2466.
  7. Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators online, 12(1), 91-115.
  8. Cobb J, R .(2010)., "Learners, goal orientation as a Factor of Successful Academic Performance in Learning Experiences", Digital Library, ICERI2010, Proceedings, 5823-5828.
  9. Cronhjort, M; Filipsson, L; & Weurlander, M.(2017). Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, (37)3,113-121.

10. Dhir, A., & Alsumait, A. (2013). Examining the Educational User Interface, Technology and Pedagogy for Arabic Speaking Children in Kuwait. Journal of Universal Computer Scienc, 19(7), 1003-1022.

11. Dweck, CS.( 2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York: Psychology Press. 58-62.

12. Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A.(2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209. 

13. Freire, P. (2005). Teachers As Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach With New Commentary by Peter McLaren, Joe L. Kincheloe. Westview Press.

14. Hamad Alsowat.(2016). An EFL Flipped Classroom Teaching Model: Effects on English Language Higher-order Thinking Skills, Student Engagement and Satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108-121.

15. Janson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Feriman, A.(2014). NMC horizon report:2014 K-12edition.Austin, Texas: The New Media Constrium.

16. Johnson, G.B.(2013). Student  Perception of  the Flipped Classroom, . Master of Arts Dissertation, University of British Colombia. Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/0101411313

17. Johnston, B. M. (2017). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in a university numerical methods mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 485-498.

18. Karagol, I.,Esen, E.,(2019). The Effect of Flipped Learning Approach on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 34(3), 708-727.

19. Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., Liem, G. A. D. & Ortiga, Y. P. (2010). the Relationship Between Future Goals and Achievement Goal Orientations: An Intrinsic–Extrinsic Motivation Perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 264-279.

20. McCoach, C. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students from High-Achieving Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144-154.

21. Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M, Maehr ML, Urdan T, Anderman LH, Anderman E, Roeser R.(1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Contemp Educ Psychol, ,23(2):113-31.

22. Moreno, J.A.,Gonzalez-Cutur, D., Sicilia, A., & Spray, C.M.(2010). Motivation in the Exercise Setting: Integrating Constructs from the Approach- Avoidance Achievement Goal Framework and Self-Determinatin Theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(6), 542-550.

23. Myung, K. L; & Bu K.P.(2018). Effects of Flipped Learning Using Online Materials in a Surgical Nursing Practicum: A Pilot Stratified Group-Randomized Trial. Healthcare Informatics Research, 24(1), 69-78.

24. O'Flaherty, J., Phillips, C. (20152016). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.

25. Okorie, E. U. (2015). Effects of Instructional Software Package Method of Teaching (ISPMT) on Students’ Interest and Achievement in Chemical Bonding. Education, 5(6), 158-165.

26. Otero-Saborido, F. M., Sánchez-Oliver, A. J., Grimaldi-Puyana, M., & Álvarez-García, J. (2018). Flipped learning and formative evaluation in higher education. Education and Training, 60 (3), 23-35.

27. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications . Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

28. Pintrich, P., and Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

29. Senko, C., & Hulleman, C. S. (2013). The role of goal attainment expectancies in achievement goal pursuit. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 504-521.

30. Thomas, J. S., & Philpot, T. A. (2012, June). An inverted teaching model for a mechanics of materials course. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

31. Tuominen-Soini , H. , Salmela-Aro , K. , & Niemivirta , M. (2011). Stability and Change in Achievement Goal-orientations: A Person-centered Approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 82-100.

32. Urdan, T. & Schoenfelder, E. (2006).Classroom Effects on Student Motivation: Goal Structures, Social Relationships and Competence Beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), pp 331 – 349.

33. Webster, D.R., Majerich, M. M., & Madden, Amanda, G. M. (2016). Flippin’ Fluid Mechanics - Comparison using two groups. Advances in Engineering Education. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.

 

Journal of Educational Psychology Studies
Volume 18, Issue 41
April 2021
Pages 17-1

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics