The effectiveness of teaching image-based arithmetic problems on students' active memory performance and their processing efficiency

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate of Curriculum Studies, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Education and Psychology.

2 Professor, Department of Education, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Education and Psychology.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of teaching image-based arithmetic problems on students' active memory performance and their processing efficiency. This research is applied in nature, and quasi-experimental design, pretest- posttest- follow up with control group was used as the method of the study.After studying and educational designing, 40 students of an elementary school in Yasouj voluntarily participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to experimental and control group (20 students in each group), and students in experimental group were taught for 9 sessions (one session per week) using representation- based instruction method. Researcher-made test was used as the data collection instrument. Variance analysis test with repeated measures was utilized to analyze data. The results revealed that there is a significant difference in the mean of active memory and processing efficiency (p≤/05) between the control and experimental group; therefore, it can be concluded that teaching image-based arithmetic problems leads to an increase in students' active memory function and their processing efficiency. In addition, the results indicated that the improvement in students' active memory performance and their processing efficiency in answering arithmetic problems are consistent over time. Finally, the results of comparing different representations in active memory performance and processing efficiency showed that the effects of different images are not the same. Therefore, using visual representation in the verbal problems of arithmetic with the priority of helpful images, bare images, useless images, and finally essential representation improves students' active memory performance.

Keywords

References

  1. گال، مردیت؛ بورگ والتر و گال، جویس. (1383). روش‌های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی. (ترجمه احمدرضا نصر و همکاران)، ‌تهران: سمت. (تاریخ انتشار به زبان اصلی 1942).
  2. Allen, K., Higgins, S., & Adams, J. (2019). The Relationship between Visuospatial Working Memory and Mathematical Performance in School-Aged Children: a Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 1-23.
  3. Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of experimental child psychology, 106(1), 20-29.
  4. Alamolhodaei, H. (2009). A working memory model applied to mathematical word problem solving. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), 183-192.
  5. Bedyńska, S., Krejtz, I., & Sedek, G. (2019). Chronic stereotype threat and mathematical achievement in age cohorts of secondary school girls: mediational role of working memory, and intellectual helplessness. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 321-335.
  6. Berends, I. E., & Van Lieshout, E. C. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 345-353.‏
  7. Beaumont, E. S., Mudd, P., Turner, I. J., & Barnes, K. (2017). Cetacean frustration: the representation of whales and dolphins in picture books for young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 545-551.‏
  8. Baddeley, A. D. (2006). Working memory: An overview. Working memory and education, 1-31.‏
  9. Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 483-501.
  10. Crisp, V., & Sweiry, E. (2006). Can a picture ruin a thousand words? The effects of visual resources in exam questions. Educational Research, 48(2), 139-154.
  11. Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational psychology review, 14(1), 5-26.
  12. Eysenck, M., Payne, S., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Trait anxiety, visuospatial processing, and working memory. Cognition & Emotion, 19(8), 1214-1228.
  13. Flores, R., Koontz, E., Inan, F. A., & Alagic, M. (2015). Multiple representation instruction first versus traditional algorithmic instruction first: Impact in middle school mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 267-281.‏
  14. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Addressing the role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving when designing intervention for struggling learners. ZDM, 1-10.‏
  15. Gagatsis, A., & Elia, I. (2004). The Effects of Different Modes of Representation on Mathematical Problem Solving. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  16. Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six-and seven-year-old children. Journal of educational psychology, 92(2), 377.
  17. Gathercole, S.E., & Alloway, T.P., (2008), Working Memory and Language. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 39(1), 3-27.
  18. Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental science, 12(4), F9-F15.
  19. Lin, Y. H., Wilson, M., & Cheng, C. L. (2013). An investigation of the nature of the influences of item stem and option representation on student responses to a mathematics test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1141-1161.‏
  20. Moradi, A., Afsardeir, B., Parhoon, H., & Sanaei, H. (2016). Cognitive performance of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in autobiographical, working and prospective memory in comparison with normal people. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 49-54.
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  22. Parmar, R. S., & Signer, B. R. (2005). Sources of Error in Constructing and Interpreting Graphs A Study of Fourth-and Fifth-Grade Students with LD. Journal of learning disabilities, 38(3), 250-261.
  23. Passolunghi, M. C., & Costa, H. M. (2019). Working memory and mathematical learning. In International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties (pp. 407-421). Springer, Cham.
  24. Rasmussen, C., & Bisanz, J. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of experimental child psychology, 91(2), 137-157.
  25. Riding, R. J., Grimley, M., Dahraei, H., & Banner, G. (2003). Cognitive style, working memory and learning behaviour and attainment in school subjects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 149-169.
  26. Seufert, T., Jänen, I., & Brünken, R. (2007). The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1055-1071.
  27. Swanson, H. L., Kehler, P., & Jerman, O. (2010). Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 24-47.
  28. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
  29. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 19-30.
  30. St Clair‐Thompson, H., Stevens, R., Hunt, A., & Bolder, E. (2010). Improving children's working memory and classroom performance. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 203-219.
  31. Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory and human movement: towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 1-25.
  32. Wang, M., Yang, Y., Wang, C. J., Gamo, N. J., Jin, L. E., Mazer, J. A., ... & Arnsten, A. F. (2013). NMDA receptors subserve persistent neuronal firing during working memory in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 77(4), 736-749.
  33. W. K. Wu. S. W. Lee. C. W. and Hsu. W. H. (2007). LIMG: Learning- initiating instruction model based on cognitive knowledge for geometry word problem comprehension. Computers & Education. 48, 582-601.
  34. Wei, H., Su, Z., & Dai, D. (2018, October). Balanced Cortical Microcircuitry-Based Network for Working Memory. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 199-210). Springer, Cham.
Journal of Educational Psychology Studies
Volume 16, Issue 35
November 2019
Pages 165-190

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics