Comparison of emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in students with and without a faking response

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 M.A, of family counseling, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, south –Tehran.

2 Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

the present study aims to compare the emotional and emotional intelligence among students with a faking response .the research method used in this study was Comparative causality. The population of 20,000 students from the Faculty of Psychology and Education was studying in the 1399 - 1400 Open University of South- Tehran.
 In this research, a sample of 295 students was selected using available sampling in two groups of pretend (149 people) and normal (146 people).They completed emotional intelligence questionnaires of Shot et a(1998) and Nejati cognitive ability (2012). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. Considering the significance of F in the variable of emotional intelligence (F=8.730 and p<0.05) and the significance of the value of F in the variable of cognitive ability (F=10.773 and p<0.05), the results of variance analysis showed that the emotional intelligence and cognitive ability of students pretended to answer And normally there is a difference. The average emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in the faking group is higher than the normal group (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be said that in the self-report scales, it seems that the respondents have the ability to faked and this ability has a positive relationship with the cognitive ability and emotional intelligence of people, therefore it is necessary to select people and use personality tests should be done according to people's cognitive ability and emotional intelligence.

Keywords

References

جزایری، سید حسن. دلاور، علی. درتاج، فریبرز. (1397). رابطه ویژگی­های شخصیتی، هوش هیجانی، سبک دلبستگی و فعالیت­های اداری با میزان شادکامی زنان­ شاغل. فصل­نامه علمی- پژوهشی دانشکده علوم پزشکی لرستان. ۲۰ ( ۳ ) 7
خسرو جاوید، مهناز. (1381). بررسی اعتبار و روایی سازه مقیاس هوش هیجانی شات. پایان‎نامه کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی. دانشکده علوم انسانی. دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. تهران
سلیمانی، اسماعیل. شیخ الاسلامی، علی. موسوی، مهناز. (1395). اثربخشی هوش هیجانی بر کفایت اجتماعی و تنظیم هیجانی دانش‌آموزان زورگو (غیر منضبط). فصلنامه روانشناسی تربیتی، 12(42)، 128-103.
عطادخت، اکبر. شیخ الاسلامی، علی. حسینی کیاسری، سیده طیبه. و جوکار کمال‌آبادی، نجمه. (1393). نقش باورهای فراشناختی و هوش هیجانی نابینایان در پیش‌بینی سازگاری اجتماعی و مقایسه‌ی آن با افراد عادی. فصلنامه افراد استثنایی، 5(17)، 166-149.
نجاتی، وحید. (1392). پرسش‌نامه توانایی‌های شناختی. طراحی و بررسی خصوصیات روان‌سنجی. تازه­های علوم شناختی. ۱۵(2)، ۱۱-۱۹.
References
 
Biderman, M. D. & Nguyen, N. T. (2004). Measuring faking pro pensity. 24th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
Bond, C. F. & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 10, 214–234. https://doi. org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
Buehl, A.K. Melchers, K. Roulin.N. (2020). Tell me sweet little lies: How does faking in interviews affect interview scores and interviewvalidity? Journal of Business and Psychology .34(1), 107–124.
Dirk. P, Linden. D. & Born.M. (2018). How Emotional Intelligence Might Get You theJob: The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Faking on Personality Tests. Human Performance. 31:1, 33-54, DOI:10.1080/08959285.2017.1407320
Ellingson, J. E. & McFarland, L. A. (2011). Understanding faking behavior through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE theory. Human Performance. 24(4), 322-337.
Hou, Lopez,F. Fan. j. )2019.(Reducing faking on personality tests: Testing a new faking mitigation procedure in a U.S. job applicant sample ,International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Kuncel, N. R. & Borneman, M. J. (2007). Toward a new method of detecting deliberately faked personality tests: The use of idiosyncratic item responses. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 15(2), 220–231.
McFarland, L. A. & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36(4), 979–1016.
McFarland, L. A. and Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85, 812-821.
McLarnon. J.W. (2019). Faking it! Individual differences in types and degrees of faking behavior Personality and Individual Differences 138 88–95
Pelt, D. H. M. van der Linden, D. & Born, M. P. (2018). How emotional intelligence might get you the job; The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and faking on personality tests. Human Performance. 31, 33–54.
Prasmara. A.(2019).Reletion between big five personalities motivation to fake and applicant faking behavior.jmk.vol. 19. 2, 2017, 85–90
Robie, C. Komar, S. & Brown, D. J. (2010). The effects of coaching and speeding on big five and impression management scale scores. Human Performance, 23(5), 446-467.
Roulin, N. Krings, F. & Binggeli, S. (2016). A dynamic model of applicant faking. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(2), 145–170
Salovey, P. & Mayer, J. D (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9,185-211.
Schilling. M. Becker. N. Grabenhorst. M. König. C. (2019). The relationship between cognitive ability and personality scores in selection situations A meta-analys is International Journal of Selection and Assessment. Int J Select Assess. 2021;29:1–18.
Schutte, N. S. Malouff, J. M. Hall, L. E. Haggerty, D. J. Cooper, J. T. Golden, C. J. & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25 (2), 167–177
Snell, A. F. Sydell, E. J. & Lueke, S. B. (1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: Integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9(2), 219-242. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00019-4
Tett, R. P. & Simonet, D. V. (2012.(Faking in personality assessment: A “multisaturation” perspective on faking as performance. Human Performance, 24, 302-321.
Vasilopoulos, N. L. Cucina, J. M. & McElreath, J. M. (2006). Do warnings of response verification moderate the relationship between personality and cognitive ability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 306-322.
Ziegler, M. (2011). Applicant faking: A look into the black box. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 49, 29–36.
Journal of Educational Psychology Studies
Volume 19, Issue 47
October 2022
Pages 110-98

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics