The investigation psychometric properties of Trigwell, s teacher approach to teaching revised- questionnaire

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Azad University, Bandar Lengeh Branch, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22111/jeps.2020.5694

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is investigation of psychometric properties Trigwell, approach to teaching- revised 22 Items questionnaire. Questionnaires were distributed between teachers, of Asalouyeh, Parsian and Shibkooh cities in south zone (Hormozgan and Bushehr) of Iran. From 501 teachers selected with randomized stratified sampling. 298 men and 203 women responded to questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is done with principal components and rotated with varimax method. Two factors is earned consist informational transformation-teacher focused and conceptual change- student focused and There are 11 Items on each factor . Loading factors was than 0/30 and none of items is omitted. Result of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) also showed that two factors questionnaire were good fit of the data to the hypothesized model. Reliability of teachers’ approach to teaching questionnaire is earned with Alpha Cronbach’s Coefficient method. Alpha Cronbach’s coefficient dimensions of teachers’ approach to teaching questionnaire consist informational transformation- teacher focused and conceptual change- student focused is obtained 0/858 and 0/862. The result showed that the two factors of approach to teaching questionnaire has acceptable validity and, reliability. This questionnaire can be used in instructional and psychological research for Iranian teachers of middle and high school course . Results of this research is generalized with caution to primary school teachers and university teachers.

Keywords


 9. Bowden, J. A. (1988). Achieving change in teaching practices. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning, New perspectives (ch.13) 
10. Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2009). Assessment policy & practice effects on New Zealand and Queensland teachers’ conceptions of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 61–75. doi:10.1080/02607470802587152
11. Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom, S., & Toom, A. (2018). Teacher educators' approaches to teaching and the nexus with self-efficacy and burnout: Examples from two teachers' universities in China. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44, 479-495.
12.Chen, J., & Brown, G.T.L. (2015). Tension between knowledge transmission and student- focused teaching approach to assessment purposes: helping students improve through transmission, teachers and teaching, 22(3), 350- 367,
DOI:10.1080/13540602.2015.1058592
13. Irving, B. Weiner, W. M., Gloria E. Miller.A. (2003). Handbook of Psychology, Volume 7 Educational Psychology. Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada.
14 .Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285–298.
15.Kaye. K. L & Brewer.G. (2013). Teacher and Student-focused Approaches: influence of learning approach and self-efficacy in a psychology postgraduate sample Psychology Learning and Teaching 12(1).
16.Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida.
17.Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(12), 405–419.
18.Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217–231.
19.Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Stud. Higher Educ. 16(2), 129–150.
20.Rosario. P., Nunez. J. C., Ferrando. P. J., Paiva. M. O., Lourenco.A & Valle. A. (2013). The relationship between approach to teaching and approach to studying: a two structural equation model for biology achievement in high school, metacognition learning, 8(6), 47-48. DOI 10.1007/s11409-013-9095-6.
21.Slavin, Robert, E. (2006). Educational Psychology: theory and practice (8thed). New York: Pearson.
22.Stes. A., Maeyer. S. D & Petegem. P. V.  (2010). Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory, Learning Environ Res, 13, 59–73. DOI10.1007/s10984-009-9066-7.
23.Taimalul. M., Kikas. E., Hinn. M., Niilo.A. (2016).Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Teaching Practices, and Teaching Approaches: Adaptation of Scales and Examining Relations, Teacher's Personality and Professionalism, 2, 123-140.
24.Tinsley, H. E. & Tinsely, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis incounseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology,34, 414-424.
25.Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., and Martin, E. (1998). Improving student learningthrough a focus on the teaching context. In Rust, C. (ed.), Improving Student Learning,Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. 97–103.
26.Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, .F, .(1999). Relations between teachers’approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning, Higher Education 37(1), 57–70.
27.Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design Common. Higher Educ. 1(2), 69–80.
28.Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–422.
29.Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P.(2005). Phenomenon graphic pedagogy and a revised approach to teaching inventory, Higher Education Research & Development. 24(4), 349–360.
30.Trigwell, K. (2012).Relations between teachers’ emotions in teachingand their approaches to teaching in higher, education, Instruction Science 40, 607–621.
31.Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology: Instructors copy, Boston: Alley and Bacon.