The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Effectiveness of schools Management with Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of Educational Management, Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology,University of Sistan and Baluchestan , Zahedan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology,University of Sistan and Baluchestan , Zahedan, Iran.

10.22111/jeps.2020.5316

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of authentic leadership on effectiveness of schools management through the mediation of knowledge sharing. This study is a correlation research. 160 school principals of Zahedan city were studied by using three questionnaires authentic leadership, knowledge sharing, and management effectiveness. For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the direct effect of authentic leadership on effectiveness of schools management (β=0.71, t=6.28), direct effect of authentic leadership on knowledge sharing (β=0.65, t=4.851) and direct effect of knowledge sharing on effectiveness of schools management (β=0.28, t=2.79) was significant. The indirect effect of authentic leadership on effectiveness of schools management was also significant with the mediator role of knowledge sharing (β=0.182). Thus can conclude that authentic leadership is positively and significantly associated with effectiveness of schools management both directly and indirectly with the mediating role of the knowledge sharing.

Keywords


23.Abdul Rahman, R. (2011). Knowledge sharing practices: A case study at Malaysia’s healthcare research institutes. The International Information and Library Review, 43(4), 207-214.
24.Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50(2020), 217-227.
25.Anastasiou, S., & Garametsi, V. (2020). Teachers’ Views on the Priorities of Effective School Management. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(1), 1. 
26.Bellei, C., Morawietz, L., Pablo Valenzuela, J. & Vanni, X. (2020). Effective schools 10 years on: factors and processes enabling the sustainability of school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 266-288.
27.Besen, F., Tecchio, E., & Fialho, F. A. P. (2017). Authentic leadership and knowledge management. Gestão & Produção, 24(1), 2–14.
28.Boonla, D., & Treputtharaet, S. (2014). The relationship between the leadership style and school effectiveness in scholl under the office of secondary education area 20. Procedia-Social and Behaviaoral Sciences, 112(2014), 991–996.
29.Crawford, J. A.,  Dawkins, S.,  Martin, A., & Lewis, G. K. (2020). Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: Reconceptualising and rethinking leaders. Australian Journal of Management,45(1), 114-133.
30.DeTienne, K. B., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C., & Harris, S. (2004). Toward a model of effective knowled,ge management and directions for future research: Culture, leadership, and CKOs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 26–43.
31.Du, R., Ai, S. Z., & Ren, Y. Q. (2007). Relationship between knowledge sharing and performance: A survey in Xi’an, China. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(1), 38-46.
32.Duh, R., Knechel, W. R., & Lin, Ch. (2020). The Effects of Audit Firms' Knowledge Sharing on Audit Quality and Efficiency. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice (2020) 39 (2), 51–79.
33.Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–24.
34.Edú–Valsania, S., Moriano , J. A., & Molero, F. (2016).  Authentic leadership and employee knowledge sharing behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(4), 487–506.
35.Elrehail, H. (2018). The relationship among Leadership, Innovation and Knowledge sharing: A guidance for analysis. Date in Brief, 19(2018), 128-133.
36.Ganguly, A.Talukdar, A. and Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organizationJournal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105-1135.
37.Gardner, W. L., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2004). Performance Gains through Positive Organizational Behavior and Authentic Leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 270–281.
38.Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (6):1120–1145.
39.Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis.The leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423– 451.
40.Hale, L. M. (2020).  [Analyzing Correlates of Effective Schools Research in High-Poverty Public Elementary Schools in Indiana]. A Dissertation for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy , College of Graduate and Professional Studies Department of Educational Leadership Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana.
41.Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2009). Assessing the Contribution of Distributed Leadership to School Improvement and Growth in Math Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2)659–689.

42.Hinojosa, A. S, McCauley, K. D, Randolph–Seng, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 595–610.

43.Hooff, V. D., & Huyseman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches. Journal of Information and management, 46(1), 1–8.

44.Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2010). Knowledge transfer to partners: A firm level perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3), 428-444.
45.İsik, N. (2020). Ethical leadership and school effectiveness: The mediating roles of affective commitment and job satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(1), 60-87.
46.Iszatt-White, M., & Kempster, S. (2019). Authentic Leadership: Getting Back to the Roots of the ‘Root Construct’? Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12193.
47.Kaya, B., & Karatepe, O. M. (2020). Does servant leadership better explain work engagement, career satisfaction and adaptiveperformance than authentic leadership?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2075-2095. 
48.Kuo, F. Y., & Young, M. L. (2008). Predicting knowledge sharing practices through intention: a test of competing models. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2697-2722.
49., H. F., Chiang, H.Y., & Kuo, H. T. (2019). Relationship between authentic leadership and nurses' intent to leave: The mediating role of work environment and burnout. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(1),52-65.
50.Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership Influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5):671–706.
51.Li, Y., Wu, T., & Lin, Ch. (2017) Authentic leadership and knowledge sharing in state–owned enterprises of China: An Empirical Study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 20 (3), 881–894.
52.McCallum, S. & O’Connell, D. (2009). Social capital and leadership development: Building stronger leadership through enhanced relational skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(2), 152–166.
53.Mustafa, Ö. (2020). An Organizational Factor Predicting School Effectiveness: School Climate. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(1), 38-50.
 54.Nawazkhan, S. (2010). Impact of Authentic Leaders on Organization Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(5), 167-172.
55.Nguyen, H. N., & Mohamed, S. (2011). Leadership behaviors, organizational culture and knowledge management practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 30(2), 206–221.
56.Ogunmokuna,O. A., Eluwoleb,  K. K., Avcib, T., Lasisib, T. T., &Ikhidea, J. E. (2020). Propensity to trust and knowledge sharing behavior: An evaluation of importance-performance analysis among Nigerian restaurant employees. Tourism Management Perspectives, 33(2020), 1-11.
57.Oyemomi, O. Liu, S. Neaga, I., & Alkhuraiji, A. (2016). How Knowledge Sharing & Business Pprocess Contribute toOrganizational Performance: Using the fsQCA Approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5222-5227.
58.Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, P. M. (2014). Hope and Positive Affect Mediating the Authentic Leadership and Creativity Relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 200– 210.
59.Ribeiro, N., Duarte, A., Filipe, R., & Torres de Oliveira, R. (2020). How authentic leadership promotes individual creativity: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies27(2), 189-202.
60.Shakir, F. J. (2011). Perceptions towards Distributed Leadership in School Improvement. International Journal ofBusiness and Management, 6(10), 256–264.
61.3Skyrme, D., & Amidon, D. (1997). The Knowledge A62.genda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 27–37.
62.Taminiau, Y., Smit, W., & DeLange, A. (2009). Innovation in management consulting firms through informal knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 42-55.
63.Wang, S., Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowlegde Sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.
64.Wang, W. T., & Hou, Y. P. (2015). Motivations of Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: A Self–determination Perspective. Information & Organization, 25(1), 1–26.
65.Weber, G. (1971). Inner–city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
66.Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Kruger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.
67.Wong, C., & Cummings, G. (2009). Authentic Leadership: a New Theory for Nursing or Back to Basics?, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(5), 522–538.
68.Yeşil, S., & Dereli, S. F. (2013). An Empirical Investigation of the Organizational Justice, Knowledge Sharing & Innovation Capability. Procedia–social & Behavioral Sciences, 75(2013), 199–208.
69.Yesil, S., Koska, A., & Buyukbese, T. (2013). Knowledge Sharing Process, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75(3), 217-225.
70.Yu, T., Lu, L., & Liu, T. (2009). Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 8(1), 32–41.
71.Zhining, W., & Nianxin, W. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
72.Ziemba, E. (2014). Prosumers’ eagerness for knowledge sharing with enterprises, a Polish study. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2(1), 40–58.