The Role of Family Relationship Patterns and Psychosocial Atmosphere Students' Mobile Network-Based Addiction Classroom

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Authors

1 associate professor.department of psychology. faculty of educational sciences and psychology.sistan and baluchestan.iran.zahedan.

2 master student of psychology department.faculty of educational sciences and psychology.sistan and baluchestan university.iran.zahedan.

10.22111/jeps.2020.5165

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of family communication patterns and classroom psychosocial and social environment in addiction to mobile-based social networks. The current study had a statistical population including all male senior high school students in Zahedan. 244 students were selected by using a multistage sampling method. In order to collect data, Koerner and Fitzpatrick Family Communication Patterns Questionnaire, Fraser et al. Classroom Psychosocial Environment Inventory, and addiction to mobile-based social networks questionnaire were used. The results indicated that both dimensions of family communication patterns were significantly and negatively related to addiction to social networks and among the dimensions of classroom psychosocial environment, friction and competition had significant and positive relationships with addiction to social networks and cohesion and discipline had significant and negative relationships with it. The results of a stepwise regression analysis showed that conversation, friction, conformity, competition, and cohesion could explain a total of 49% of variances in addiction to social networks. Therefore, according to the findings of the present study, families can be suggested to adopt conversational strategies when interacting with their children and teachers are recommended to direct their classroom environments towards cohesion and constructive engagement.

Keywords


28.Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2012). “Making kind cool”: Parents' suggestions for preventing cyber bullying and fostering cyber kindness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46 (4), 415-436.
29.Gunuc, S., & Dogan, A. (2013). The relationships between Turkish adolescents’ Internet addiction, their perceived social support and family activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (6), 2197-2207.
30.Huang, X., Zhang, H., Li, M., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Tao, R. (2009). Mental health, personality, and parental rearing style of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13 (4), 401–406.
31.Li, W., Garland, E.L., & Howard, M. (2014). Family factors in Internet addiction among Chinese youth: a review of English- and Chinese-language studies. Computer in Human Behavior, 31 (1), 393-411.
32.Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2011). Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within-and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 345-354.
33.Newberry, M., & Davis, H. A (2008). The role of elementary teachers’ conceptions of closeness to students on their differential behaviour in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (8), 1965-1985.
34.Pace, U., Carlo, Z., Guzzo, G., Maggio, R., Laudani, Ch., & Cacioppo, M. (2014). Internet addiction temperament, and the moderator role of family emotional involvement. International .Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12 (1), 52-63.
35.Park, S. K., Kim, J. Y., & Cho, C. B. (2008). Prevalence of Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence, 43(172), 895-909.
36.Stan, A. A. (2013). The factors influencing the Internet addiction of secondary education students. Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 131-148.
37.Wang, H., Zhou, X., Lu, C., Wu, J., Deng, X., & Hong, L. (2011). Problematic Internet use in high school students in Guangdong Province, China. PloS one, 6 (5), e19660.
 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019660
38.Young, K.S. (1996) Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79 (3), 899-902.