Content Analysis of the Thinking and Research Book of the Sixth Primary on the basis of Thinking Processes

Document Type : Scientific Articles

Author

faculty member

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of the book of Thinking and Research on the sixth grade of the elementary school according to the amount of attention to thinking processes in the academic year of 96-95. The research method was descriptive and content analysis was quantitative. The statistical population of the study consisted of the sixth elementary school of thought and research textbook and sampling method was census, this book was selected and analyzed as a sample. The research tool was a checklist. To determine the validity of the research, formal and content validity was used and to determine the reliability of the two half-way method, the correlation coefficient of the two halves was 0.75. It is calculated. Unit of analysis; sentences, activities and images contained in the text of the book Thinking and Research. In content analysis using Shannon entropy method, the importance of the coefficients of thinking processes (mental organization of information (0.41), critical thinking (0.336) and creative thinking (0.171) were calculated. The results of the findings showed that the textbook of thought and research has less consistency in terms of attention to the processes of thinking, and has paid close attention to some of the processes of thinking (critical thinking) and to the process (creative thinking) has been somewhat paid attention . Therefore, the content of the book of Thinking and Research is based on the sixth primitive in terms of observing the processes of thinking needs to be reviewed and rewritten.

Keywords

References

35.Albergaria, P (2011). ‘Critical Thinking, Questioning and Creativity as Components ofInteligence’, Journal of Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30(2): 66-78
36.Barrow, W (2010). ‘Dialogic, Participation, and the Potential for Philosophy for Children’,Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5 (2): 89-101
37.DeWaelsche, S. A (2015). Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean University English courses. Linguistics and Education, 1-17. URL:
38.Dondlinger. M. J & Wilson, D. A (2012). Creating an alternate reality: Critical, creative, and empathic thinking generated in the Global village Playground capstone experience. Thinking skills and Creativity, 7(3): 153-164.
 39.Elder, L. & Paul, R. (2013). Analytic thinking: A Miniature Guide for Studentsand Faculty. The Foundation for Critical thinking Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for critical thinking.
40.Elder, L. & Paul, R. (2015). The Miniature Guide the art of Asking EssentialQuestion. The Foundation for Critical thinking Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for critical thinking.
41.Ennis, Robert h. (2002) An outline of goals for a critical thinking curriculum and its assessment, available at:http://faculty. ed. Uiuc.edu/rhennis
42.Hogan, M. J. (2016). Cultivating thought-full and Creative thinkers: A comment on quality merging Costa with Claxton et al. Thinking Skills and Creativity 1: 152-154
43.Hook, A. (2009). JohnDewey. In S. Cuhn (Ed.),Philosophy of education:The essential texts. NewYork: Routledge
44.Lpray, C. Karakaya, E. & Yilmaz, S. (2015) Contextual Teaching and learning: what it is and why it’s here to stay, United Kingdom, Corwin press.
45.Lu, L. & Ortlieb, E. T. (2018). Teacher Candidates as Innovative ChangeAgents. Current Issues in Education, 11(5). Available: http://cie. ed. Asu.edu/ volume11/ number5.
46.Marina, L. M. & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicitinstruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6: 3-11.
47.Monteiro, C. Mattos, A. & Margaret, G (2009). “Improving Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning with a Continuing Education Course”, Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Vol 40, No 3, pp 121-127
48.Pascarella, E; Palmer, B; Moye, M; & Pierson, C. T (2016).effects of Diversity experiences on critical thinking skills , the collegiate assessment of academic proficiency.
49.Popia, I. (2011). “Promotion of Critical Thinking by Using Case Studies as Teaching Method”,Journal of Nurse Education Today, 31(2): 204-207.
50.Sokol, A. & et al. (2008). “The Development of Inventive Thinking Skills in the Upper. Rutledge publishing.
 51.Turnbull, M., Littlei, A., & Allan, M. (2010). Creativity snd collaborative lwarning and teaching strategies in thedrsign dis crippling Indication. Arts Education Policy Review, 111, 52-62.
 
Journal of Educational Psychology Studies
Volume 16, Issue 34
June 2019
Pages 93-130

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics