Formulation of Resiliency Models According to Identity Styles and Sense of Failure in Married Teachers in City of Babol

Authors

Teacher Education

Abstract

The present study was carried out to formulate resiliency model with regard to identity styles and sense of failure among married teachers in the city of Babol. Method: To collect data, a sample of 300 individuals of teachers in the city of Babol was selected through random cluster sampling. The instruments used to achieve the objectives of research include Brzonsky Identity Style Inventory (ISI-6G), the Sense of Failure Scale, and Resiliency Scale for Adults (RSA). To analyze data, path analysis was used. Findings: The results showed that the informational identity style directly, the normative identity style with mediating role of the sense of failure, and avoidant identity style directly and with mediating role of the sense of failure affect on resiliency. Conclusion: The avoidant identity style and normative identity style are severely suffered from stress when there is a stressful situation for success. Sense of failure causes resiliency and tolerance of individuals to be reduced against stress. So, they have a negative impact on resiliency. On the contrary, people with informative identity style have high resiliency and tolerance against stress.

Keywords


15-Adams, G. R. Munro, B. Doherty-Poirer, M. Munro, G. Petersen, A. M. R. & Edwards, J. (2001). Diffuse-avoidance, normative, and informational identity styles: Using identity theory to predict maladjustment. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(4), 307-320.and Social Psychology, 60, 89–99.
 16-Allan, S. & Gilbert, P. (2002). Anger and anger expression in relation to perceptions of social rank, entrapment and depressive symptoms. Personality and IndividualDifferences, 32, 551–565.
17-Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style and social cognitive reasoning. Journal of adolescence, 8, 287-296.
18-Berzonsky, M. D. (2003). Identity Style and Well-Being: Does Commitment Matter State University of New York, Cortland,NY.
19-Berzonsky, M. D. & Kuk, L. S. (2000). Identity status, identity processing style and the transition to university. Journal of adolescent research, 15(1),81-98.
20-Connor, K.M. Davidson, J.R.T. & Lee, L.C. (2003). Spirituality, resilience, and anger in survivors of violent trauma: A community survey. Journal of Traumatic Stress، 16(5): 487-94.
21-Friborg, O. Hjemdal, O. Rosenvinge, J. H. & Martinussen, M. (2003).A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protectiveresources behin healthyadjustment?International Journal ofmethods in Psychiatric Research, 12, 65–76.
22-Giddens, A. (2001) Modernity and self-identity. Trans. Movaffaghian N. Tehran: Ney.
23-Izadian, N؛ Amiri, M؛ Jahromi, R&Hamidi, Sh. (2010). A study of relationship between suicidal ideas, depression,resiliency, daily stresses and mental health among Tehran university students. Proscenia Social and Behavioral Sciences، 5: 151-59.
24-Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist, 56(3), 227.
25-Papy,H. khagevand,A.boromandnasab,m (2014). A Study of the Relationship between Identity Styles and Resilience in High School students.Academic Journal of Psychological Studies.
26-Schwartz, J. S. (2001). The Evolution of Eriksonian and Neo-Eriksonian Identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An international. Journal of theory and research, 1(1), 7-85.
27-Siebert, Al. (2005). The resiliency advantage. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koelher Publisher.
28-Taylor p.j, (2010). The role of defeat and entrapment in suicide. A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctorof Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences.
29-Taylor, P J؛ Wood, A M؛ Gooding, P؛ Johnson, J & Tarrier, N. (2009). Are defeat and entrapment best defined as a single construct? Personality and Individual Differences، 47(7): 795-97.