تاثیر کیفیت زندگی کاری معلمان مقطع ابتدایی بر خود کارآمدی با میانجیگری جو سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

10.22111/jeps.2025.50223.5860

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر کیفیت زندگی کاری بر خود کارآمدی معلمان مقطع ابتدایی با نقش میانجی جو سازمانی بود. این مطالعه از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش پژوهش، همبستگی از نوع معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه معلمان ابتدایی شهر ایرانشهر بوده و حجم نمونه به استناد جدول تعیین حجم نمونه سینگ و ماسوکو برابر با 367 نفر (202 مرد و 165 زن ) برآورد شد. از شیوه‌ی نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای و نمونه‌گیری در دسترس استفاده شد. برای گردآوری داده ها از سه پرسشنامه کیفیت زندگی کاری میرکمالی و نارنجی (1387)؛ پرسشنامه خود کارآمدی معلمان تیچانن-موران و وولفولک-هوی (2001) و پرسشنامه جو سازمانی هالپین و کرافت (2000) استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از آماره‌های توصیفی همچون محاسبه فراوانی‌ها، درصد، میانگین، انحراف معیار و آماره‌های استنباطی همچون آزمون ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و مدل معادلات ساختاری با بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS27 و PLS استفاده شد. یافته‌ها بر اساس آزمون آماره t برابر با 92/6 و ضریب مسیر برابر با 60/0 بیانگر آن است که کیفیت زندگی کاری بر خود کارآمدی معلمان با میانجیگری جو سازمانی تأثیر مثبت دارد. در این راستا نتایج آزمون سوبل برابر با 33/12 نشان داد که میزان تأثیر کیفیت زندگی کاری بر خود کارآمدی معلمان با میانجیگری جو سازمانی افزایش می‌یابد. می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که سازمان‌های آموزشی باید نسبت به ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی کاری معلمان حساس بوده و جو سازمانی مناسبی ایجاد کرده و دستگاه‌های مربوطه را که در خدمت توسعه حرفه‌ای معلمان و ارتقای اثربخشی تدریس باشد، بهبود بخشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Primary School Teachers’ Quality of Work Life on the Self-Efficacy with the Mediation of Organizational Climate

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vali Mehdinezhad 1
  • Morad Aَbjameh 2
1 Corresponding Author, Associate professor, Farhangian University, Tehran,Iran
2 M.A in Educational Administration, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of quality of work life on self-efficacy of primary school teachers with the mediating role of organizational climate. This study was applied in terms of purpose and structural equation correlation in terms of research method. The target population of the study was all elementary school teachers in Iranshahr, 897 subject (494 male and 403 female). The sample size was estimated to be 367 subject (202 male and 165 female) based on the Singh and Masuku’s sample size determination table. Stratified random sampling and convenience sampling were used. Three questionnaires of quality of work life by Mirkamali and Narenji (2008); teacher self-efficacy questionnaire by Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk-Hoy (2001), and Organizational Climate Questionnaire by Halpin and Croft (2000) were used to collect data. To analyze the data were used descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and inferential statistics such as Pearson's correlation coefficient test and structural equation model with using SPSS27 and PLS software. The findings based on the t-statistic test equal to 6.92 and the path coefficient equal to 0.60 indicate that the quality of work life has a positive effect on teachers' self-efficacy with the mediation of organizational climate. In this regard, the results of the Sobel test equal to 12.33 showed that the effect of the quality of work life on teachers' self-efficacy increases with the mediation of organizational climate. Recommended educational organizations should be sensitive to improving the quality of work life of teachers,

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • quality of working life
  • self-efficacy
  • organizational atmosphere of the school
  • primary school teachers
سابقی، فرامرز و رئیسی آهوان، اسحاق. (1393). تبیین رابطه اعتیاد به کار با کیفیت زندگی کاری معلمان ابتدایی. مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 11(20)، 116-101. http://doi:10.22111/jeps.2014.2138   
طهماسبی قرابی، احمد؛ آقایی هشجین، عسگر؛ سبزی، امیررضا؛ جهانبانی، عفت؛ کاید خورده، محمد؛ ظهیری، منصور. (1402). روایی و پایایی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه جوّ سازمانی هالپین و کرافت با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی ‌تأییدی: یک مطالعه در‌‌ میان کارکنان مراکز فوریت‌های پزشکی در ایران.  فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی بهداشت در عرصه. 11(3)، 9-1. https://doi.org/10.22037/jhf.v11i3.43942
گراوند، هوشنگ و قبادیان، مسلم. (1400). ارائه مدل علّی ادراک از محیط سازنده‌گرای اجتماعی و جهت‌گیری‌های انگیزشی: نقش واسطه‌ای باورهای خودکارآمدیو انتظار پیامد . مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 18(42)، 63-22. https://doi:10.22111/jeps.2021.6401 
قاسمی، علی؛ کدیور، پروین؛ کرامتی، هادی؛ عربزاده، مهدی. (1348). بررسی روایی و پایایی پرسش‌نامه خودکارآمدی معلم.  فصلنامه علمی پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی، 6(2)، 92-82. https://doi.org/10.30473/etl.2018.5142
میرکمالی، سید محمد؛ نارنجی ثانی، فاطمه. (1401). بررسی رابطه کیفیت زندگی کاری و رضایت شغلی بین اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه‌های تهران و صنعتی شریف. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی. 14(2)، 101-70
References
Aba, G. (2009). The relationship between quality of work life and motivation: An empirical study in the health sector (Unpublished master thesis). Akdeniz University Institute of Social Sciences, Antalya.
Açikgöz, A., & Günsel, A. (2011). The effects of organizational climate on team innovativeness. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.102
Arbabi, A., & Mehdinezhad, V. (2015). School principals’ collaborative leadership style and relation it to teachers’ self-efficacy. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(5), 125-131 https://doi.org/10.5861/IJRSE.2015.1218
Bakker, AB., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. http://doi:10.1037/ocp0000056
Balusamy, K., & Sivakumar, A. (2020). Quality of Work Life among School Teachers in Palakkad District,” Mukt Shabd Journal, 5(4), 3025–3032, https://shabdbooks.com/index.php/volume-9-issue-4-2020
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. WH Freeman and Company, New York.
Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, L. F. (2016). Preservice teacher self-efficacy beliefs; an opportunity to generate “good research” in the Asia-Pacific Region. In S. Garvis& D. Pendergast (Eds.), AsiaPacific perspectives on teacher selfefficacy.1-18 Rotterdam, Netherlands; Sense Publishers.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., and Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: a study at the school level. J. Sch. Psychol. 44, 473–490. http://doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
Casio, W.F. (1992). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Worklife, Profits, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York
Coelho, R., Costa, V., & Esgalhado, G. (2024). Self-efficacy and Quality of Working Life: the mediating role of Self-esteem. Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology58(2), e1900. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v58i2.1900
Demir, T. (2016). Relationship between quality of work life perception and organizational commitment in vocational school teachers (Unpublished master thesis). Sabahattin Zaim University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
DeRoche, E. F. (2011). Leadership for Character Education Programs. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education, and Development, 39, 41-46.
Du, Y., Li P., & Zhang, L. (2018). Linking job control to employee creativity: The roles of creative self-efficacy and regulatory focus. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(3), 187–197. http://doi:10.1111/ajsp.12219   
Erginer, A. (2003). The nature of work life. C. Elma and K. Demir (Ed.), Contemporary approaches in management in. Memoir Publishing.
Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2016). Teachers' self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 185–195.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2003). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.
Halpin, A. W., & Croft, D. B. (2000). Organizational climate of school. Chicago, Midwest Administration Centre, University of Chicago
Hashemi Dehaghi Z, Sheikhtaheri A. (2014). Quality of work life and job satisfaction of nursing managers. Iran J Public Health. 43(4), 537- 8.
Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1993). Principal leadership behaviors and school achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 20-28
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hood, JN., & Smith, HL. (1981). Quality of work life in home care. The contribution of leaders' personal concern for staff. J Nurs Adm. 24(1), 40-7.
Jaafari, P., Karami, S., & Soleimani, N. (2012). The relationship among organizational climate, organizational learning and teachers’ self-efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2212-2218. http://doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.06.974
Jenkins, D. (1981). QWL: Current Trends and Direction, A series of occasional paper. No.3, Ontario: Quality of Work Life Centre.
Kiel, E., Braun, A., Muckenthaler, M., Heimlich, U., & Weiss, S. (2020). Self-efficacy of teachers in inclusive classes. How do teachers with different self-efficacy beliefs differ in implementing inclusion? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1683685
Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Har Chong, W., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F., et al. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 34, 67–76. http://doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.08.001      
Klassen, R. M., and Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 12, 59–76. https://doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001    
Li, Q., Li X., Wang, F., Zhao, J., Zhao, G., Chen, L., Du, H., & Chi, P. (2020). Teachers' quality of work life and attitudes toward implementing a psychosocial intervention for children affected by parental HIV/AIDS: roles of self-efficacy and burnout. AIDS Care. 32(9), 1125-1132. https://doi:10.1080/09540121.2020.1757606.
Liu, L. (2024). The relationship of transformational leadership on teachers’ innovative behavior and teachers’ self-efficacy. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 12405.
https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/12405
Love, A. M. A., Toland, M. D., Usher, E. L., Campbell, J. M., & Spriggs, A. D. (2019). Can I teach students with autism spectrum disorder? Investigating teacher self-efficacy with an emerging population of students. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 89, 41- 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.02.005
Marschall, G. (2022). The role of teacher identity in teacher self-efficacy development: the case of Katie. J Math Teacher Educ 25, 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09515-2
Miner, J. B. (2015). Organizational Behavior 4: From Theory to Practice. New York: Routledge.
Owens, R. E., & Valesky, T. C. (2015). Organizational Behavior in Education: Leadership and School Reform. New York: Pearson.
Patras, Y. E., Hidayat, R., & Billah, M. A. (2021). Contribution and priority action of the self-efficacy and organizational climate to improve innovative work behavior. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 2941. https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v5i2.2941
Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2019). Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 40(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/014303431879804
Putwain, D. W., & Von der Embse, N. P. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy moderates the relations between imposed pressure from imposed curriculum changes and teacher stress. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1500681
Savitry, N. Z., Sulastiana, M., & Yanuarti, N. (2021). The effects of learning climate on innovative work behavior in digital start-up company. Almana: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v5i1.1536
Shah, N. H., Shaheen, I., & Abbas, A. (2022). Effect of organizational climate on self-efficacy of Teachers at secondary school level in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Social Sciences Advancement3(4), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.52223/JSSA22-030403-49
Singh, A.S., & Masuku, M.B. (2014). Sampling Techniques and Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: An Overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 2(11), 1-22. https://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/21131.pdf
Taguiri, R., & Litwin, G. H. (2010). Organizational Climate: Explorations of a Concept. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
Veletić, J., Price, H. E., & Olsen, R. V. (2023). Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of school climate: The role of principals’ leadership style in organizational quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(4), 525–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09413-6
Walton, Richard E. (1973). Quality of Work Life: What is it? Sloan Management Review, 15 (1), 11-21.
Yang, H., & Villanueva, L. E. (2024). The Impact of School Climate on Teachers’ Self-efficacy Towards a Comprehensive Program for Professional Development. Journal of Education and Educational Research8(3), 463-475. https://doi.org/10.54097/75sg9175
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Zysberg, L., & Schwabsky, N. (2021). School climate, academic self-efficacy and student achievement. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1813690